For Media

Hotels for Press
Accommodation levels in Rio de Janeiro are anticipated to be at full occupancy during the conference. While it is not the responsibility of the United Nations to procure accommodation for the media, it should be noted that the Brazilian national organizing committee for Rio+20 has committed to blocking a minimum of 500 hotel rooms in Rio de Janeiro for media covering the conference. Costs must be covered by the media. For more details, visit: http://www.rio20.gov.br For information regarding room availability please contact: Terramar Travel Agency

Emails: reservas2@terramar.tur.br or reservas4@terramar.tur.br or reservas8@terramar.tur.br

Tel: (+55+21) 35120067 or (+55+11) 30142042 or (+55+19) 35145600

Media representatives must present their approval letter and copy rio20.hoteis@itamaraty.gov.br when requesting their accommodations.

Information
  • Published on: 31 Oct 2011
  • Submitted by: World Resources Institute
  • More information

Submission by The Access Initiative (TAI) for UNCSD 2012 (Rio+20)
II - What We Want from Rio+20

The two main themes for Rio+20 are (a)the institutional framework for sustainable development (IFSD) and (b) green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty alleviation. Principle 10 is fundamental to both of these themes and provides the underlying and enabling conditions for the success of Rio+20 outcomes. In 2011 we launched the Three Demands Campaign (3D Campaign) because we were concerned that the Rio+20 preparatory meetings were only focusing on international environmental governance (IEG) when the UN mandate for Rio+20 set a much wider agenda in IFSD and we wanted to ensure that national environmental governance (NEG) was included in the discussions (see below for results of the campaign). In the context of NEG, Principle 10 has received supportive mention in the submission of governments, civil society organisations as well as in the outcome documents of international gatherings leading up to Rio+20 (See Annex 2). In this context, here are our suggestions for Rio+20:

1. Structure of the Outcome Document: We expect the political document adopted at Rio+20 to be (a) visionary (b) build on the Rio Declaration, Agenda 21 and the Johannesburg Plan of implementation, (c) identify the gaps in achieving the goals set by these decisions and (d) spell out concrete steps that will be taken by governments in the next decade to fill these gaps. With regard to NEG and Principle 10 we outline below the key gaps that need to be filled and the priority measures that need to be taken.


2. Concrete Proposals ? Moving from Principles to Rights: For the reasons stated below, we propose that the outcome document acknowledge in unequivocal terms, the importance of Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration for solving environmental issues and advancing sustainable development. We propose that the document contain:


a. A clear mandate to the UN secretariat to commence negotiations on a UN framework convention on Principle 10. A framework convention will set out the basic standards and goals for state parties under Principle 10, require regional bodies to initiate negotiations on regional conventions containing binding obligations including compliance and monitoring mechanisms and establish a timeline for the negotiation of the regional conventions. A framework convention could incentivize national and regional Principle 10 reforms with added privileges, benefits and recognition for nations that
pursue them.

b. Alternatively, a mandate to UNEP regional offices or UN Regional Economic Commissions and encouragement to other regional inter-governmental organizations to negotiate regional or sub-regional conventions on Principle 10. This proposal is also reflected in the 3D
campaign results below.

c. A clear mandate to UNEP (as an interim priority measure) to develop a robust program for promoting the Bali Guidelines for the Development of National Legislation on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (2010) adopted by the UNEP Governing Council and for building the capacity of governments and civil society
to implement the said guidelines.

d. The constitution of a task force comprised of civil society representatives, governments and UN Agencies to develop, within one year, a universal set of guidelines, procedures and institutional reforms applicable to UNEP and other UN Agencies implementing Principle 10 in UN agency decision-making to be applied in their day-to-day work and deliberations.

e. We expect the outcome document to set out a time frame for the completion of these commitments and mandates. We also highlight below, four other initiatives that will further the goals of principle 10 which may be featured in the informal space at Rio+20.


3. Further Concrete Proposals ? 3D Campaign: As part of the 3D Campaign, civil society coalitions and partners all over the world (currently in over 30 countries) collectively developed and made three top national environmental governance demands from each of their governments. A number of demands stood out, either called for by a number of countries, or urgent in nature. These demands ranged from legal reforms to practice changes and are listed in our interim report. All of these demands should find a place within the Rio+20 outcome document and should be included in the zero draft.


a. Regional Conventions on Principle 10: Many countries have regulations requiring access in major areas of environmental concern. Yet much of the time, these laws remain unenforced and accountability mechanisms are weak. Civil society organizations in many countries feel that an international mechanism to mutually raise one another to a higher level of performance would improve access at the national level. This proposal is also reflected in those set out above.

b. Improving Environmental Assessment Practice: A common request in many countries was expansion and improvement of access to information and public participation in environmental impact assessments (EIA). While EIA procedures are useful for decision-making they are by no means sufficient means for ensuring sustainable development. However, when EIA processes are used they need to be transparent and participatory and accountable. This is often seen as one of the most important means of improving decision-making and environmental quality of new development.

c. Broad Legal Reforms for Access: In some countries, coalitions felt that all three access rights could be addressed in an overarching legal reform, rather than in piecemeal legislation, as has been the practice in many countries.

d. Environmental Databases: In a number of participatŽing countries, regulations call for the regular publicaŽtion of environmental data and related information. However, many of these regulations have gone unimplemented with tremendous gaps in data collection, analysis, and publication.

e. Environmental Courts: Environmental courts provide what can be an effective and cheaper means of dispute resolution than regular courts. Specialized attention to enviŽronmental laws and increased scientific expertise can mean that victims of pollution may be able to have their environmental complaints addressed in a faster, cheaper, more predictable manner.

f. Citizen Enforcement: In many countries, law enforceŽment officers are spread thin, with little ability to priŽoritize among serious environmental issues. For that reason, a number of countries felt the need for citizen enforcement of environmental laws and rights. We request that governments establish citizen suit provisions allowing for citizen enforcement of laws.


4. Reasons for our Proposals - Implementation Gaps & How to Fill Them: National environmental governance (NEG) improvements should include better coordination among government agencies, clear environmental laws and more efficient bureaucratic procedures. At the heart of good NEG is Principle 10 ? which requires more open, inclusive and accountable decision-making.
In our first submission to the Rio+20 processes in response to UNDESA?s 2010 questionnaire, we identified a number of gaps in Principle 10 implementation. Foremost among the gaps in implementing Principle 10 are:
? weak implementation across all three pillars of Principle 10 (information access, public participation and access to justice);
? weak laws on public participation and access to justice; and
? the lack of affirmative legal rights for empowering the poor and marginalized groups to have a voice and say in decisions that affect them.

We also provided good examples of Principle 10 implementation and practice including examples of progressive access to information laws from Mexico and India and good practice examples from countries that have signed the Aarhus Convention. Philippines and Indonesia have recently established environmental courts to provide greater access to justice on environmental matters, while Chile is reforming its environmental impact assessment laws to ensure that poor and marginalized people have more voice and access to the decision-making process. Thailand is revising its public participation laws to improve public engagement spaces. While there is progress in some countries, in others access rights are being curtailed.

There are plenty of examples of good practice and guidelines and tools to help governments and civil society implement Principle 10 ? what is needed is political commitments, a framework convention, serious and urgent law and institutional reforms at the national and regional levels and funding for governments and civil society to work on improving laws, administrative capabilities, and building the capacity of civil society to use the access rights more effectively.

5. Comments on Existing Proposals: A number of governments, civil society organisations and international organizations have acknowledged the importance of improving transparency, citizen engagement and accountability (Principle 10) as part of the Rio +20 Agenda. These include several governments, the European Union, the Declaration from the 4th Meeting of the parties of the UN European Economic Commission?s Aarhus Convention (Chisinau Declaration) and the resolution from the European Union Parliament. Additionally, several UN documents acknowledge the importance of Principle 10 and the need to fully implement it. In particular the Synthesis Report of the Secretary General, the UNEP Report on the Green Economy, UNECLAC Report for the Regional Consultation, the Beijing High Level Consultation texts, the Latin America and Caribbean Regional Meeting Statement, and The Chair?s text from the UNESCAP Asia pacific regional meeting in Seoul. For a summary of these statements see Annex 1.
6. Statements have also been made in support for full implementation by civil society groups including the Stakeholder Forum, Article XIX, ourselves, and the NGO, Women?s and Youth Major Groups. Many call for a global Principle 10 convention. Others support regional Principle 10 conventions. These proposals and submission together signify broad based support for moving from principles to rights enshrined in national laws and practiced by government institutions and civil society ? rights that enable people to obtain environmental information held by governments and corporations, rights that enable people to engage in government decision-making on the environment and rights that enable people to hold decision-makers accountable for their decisions.

III - IFSD: Formal and Informal Initiatives on Principle 10

There are formal and informal initiatives that will improve national environmental governance and move Principle 10 to concrete enforceable rights. These are:

1. As part of the 3D Campaign, civil society coalitions and partners all over the world (currently in over 30 countries) collectively developed and made three top national environmental governance demands from each of their governments. Several governments, including South Africa, Jamaica and Hungary have agreed in writing to implement at least one of these governance demands. These demands form a framework for action across countries and in regions. A formal mechanism to share experiences, capacity building, training etc can be built from these demands and government commitments.

2. Co-led by USA and Brazil, the Open Government Partnership (OGP) consisting of eight founding governments and civil society issued a declaration of principles on open government in September 2011 on the margins of the UNGA. Dozens of other government are expected to join the partnership in March 2012 when they meet in Rio for their second meeting. Each partner government has developed a set of time bound commitments to improve open government, including commitments on environmental governance. This specific cooperation mechanisms could allow for an environmental caucus to be developed that will look specifically at improvements in the passage of freedom of information laws and implementation efforts, discuss the use of technology to improve transparency and citizen participation as well as provide a framework for collaboration which is subject to accountability peer review mechanisms

3. The USA and some other governments are considering the establishment of an International Partnership for Environmental Governance (I-PEG) either as a caucus within OGP or as a free standing partnership. The purpose of this partnership will be to improve national environmental governance by improving the clarity and effectiveness of environmental laws, improving the coordination and efficiency, of institutions responsible for promoting sustainable development, increasing transparency, citizen engagement and accountability of sustainable development decision-making and reducing corruption.

4. It is likely that Eye on Earth Summit (Abu Dhabi Dec-2011 multi-stakeholder meeting) will affirm the need for full implementation of Principle 10 and launch a special initiative to implement Principle 10 globally. The initiative will include sharing of good practices, capacity building, monitoring and assessment of Principle 10 implementation.


IV - The link between the Green Economy and IFSD

If a green economy is to be a tool for achieving sustainable development and poverty eradication we need to highlight the importance of improving national environmental governance. Achieving sustainable development will require making policy decisions that involve balancing competing interests and reaching environmentally sustainable, economically sound and socially equitable outcomes. If decision making processes are secret, non-participatory and unaccountable, a few selected and powerful interests will influence policy and developmental decisions. Principle 10 and good national environmental governance which recognizes coordination, efficiency, transparency, engagement and accountability becomes a foundational and enabling requirement for the success of a green economy and sustainable development.

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
For the green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication to succeed, we believe that sustainable development goals (SDGs) that eventually become part of the Millennium Development Goals in a post 2015 world would help set global targets that nations can strive for. But these goals cannot be confined to thematic goals covering water, oceans, pollutants etc. SDGs must include clear good governance goals as well. If such goals cannot be negotiated in time for the Rio+20 meeting, at the very least, a process should be established to negotiate such goals in the lead up to the review of the Millennium Development Goals in 2015. This will ensure that we have real targets that the international community and national governments can work towards. Governance goals are currently not reflected in the MDG framework. In this regard we recommend that the Rio+20 Summit examines carefully the proposals submitted by Colombia and the goals enunciated in the Bonn Declaration from the 64th UN-DPI Conference of over 1200 civil society organisations. We propose the following four good governance SDGs be included in the Rio+20 outcomes or a process for their negotiation be put in place at Rio+20:

ACCESS TO INFORMATION
By 2022, governments will enact and implement Freedom of Information laws giving people the right to obtain accurate and truthful information held by their government, especially on the environment. Governments will actively make available to all stakeholders useful, accurate and truthful well publicized data and information in appropriate formats and languages, including on the internet. These laws should include whistleblower protection and should extend to information disclosure by corporations.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
By 2022, governments need to ensure that voluntarism and citizen engagement are incorporated in all global, national and local action plans for implementation of sustainable development and human well-being, to commit to the creation of an enabling environment for citizen engagement and voluntary action, and will include mandatory public participation in

(a) major development project approvals and environmental impact assessment procedures,
(b) drafting of national level sustainable development policies, laws and regulations and
(c) administrative decisions such as pollution permitting.

ACCESS TO REDRESS AND REMEDY
By 2022, governments will adopt and implement laws ensuring effective access to judicial and administrative proceedings concerning sustainable development, including redress and remedy. In particular, they will ensure that the costs of such proceedings are reasonable and affordable to affected people and that access to such proceedings is available through expansion of legal standing and other means to interested people and organizations.

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE FOR THE POOR AND MARGINALIZED
By 2022, governments will adopt laws that obligate government agencies to take appropriate measures to provide information and engage affected people living in poverty, women and other disadvantaged groups when making sustainable development decisions.





Copyright (c) United Nations 2011 | Terms of Use | Privacy Notice | Contact | Site Map | New